Let this time I will explain the conflict as something that can not be separated from humans. here we will explain that how the conflict unfolds. Okay I've compiled about the conflict below, may be useful for us all.
A. CONFLICK
Humans as a way of social life in which human beings need other human beings essentially because man can not live alone without interacting. with their social interaction, life goes well, as for individual and group interaction Atar. Humans and even then alone can not be separated from two things: Conflict and cooperation. Thus manusi can never be separated from two things ..
Conflict is from the Latin meaning that cinfigurer hit each other. In sosioligis conflict interpreted from a process between one person or more (called kelomok) where an attempt to get rid of the other party in a way to destroy it or make it powerless. Conflict in large dictionary Indonesian was (2002) interpreted as pencekokan, strife, and discord.
The expert opinions on knflik among others:
Kartono and Gulo (1987)
Konfik is the lack of agreement in the opinion of emotions and actions with others. The situation is the result of impulses, desires, wishes and so contradictory, but work in the same time.
Robbins (1998)
proes also interpreted as a conflict that began when a party feel that the other party has negatively affected, or will mepengaruhi negative way, something noticed by the first party. A mismatch can not be considered as an act of conflict when one party yet know or understand the mismatch.
White and Bednar (1991)
Conflicts one of the interactions between people or groups who feel their interdependent conflicting objectives and mutually interfere with each other between one dala achieve that goal.
We already know a wide range of definitions in the catapult by experts with us can know about social conflict.
Conflicts are sourced from human to have a variety of reasons, so that stuff conflicts that occur in humans. So it is difficult to be made clearly and in detail of the sources of conflict. It is in karnakan something that should be a source of conflict, as well as vice versa. Sometimes something trivial nature could be a conflict between humans. Conflict in the background backs of differences in the characteristics that brought the individual in an interaction.
These differences sometimes includes physical traits, intelligence, knowledge, customs, beliefs, and so forth. By brought with him to the characteristics of the individual in social interaction, conflict is a normal situation in the community and not the people who have never experienced a conflict between its members as well as with other public tiem. The conflict will be lost if shared with the community itself.
The conclusion of the conflict is very diverse and sometimes irrational nature. By because we are not to be indecisive that mencadi source of conflict is a certain thing, let alone just is based on the things that are rational.
In general, the appearance of a conflict of interest as follows.
1.tidak equal to the needs, values and goals
2.adanya resources such as power, influence, space, time, money, fame, position and competition
Soetopo (1999) classifies the type of conflict, in terms of the material into four, namely:
a. conflict of interest
Conflict of interest occurs when there are two competitive goals or even contradictory.
b. the role conflicts
The role conflicts arise because men have more than one role and each role does not always have interests
same.
c. conflicts value
Value conflicts may arise because it is essentially the value of every individual in the organization is not the same, so the conflict
may occur between individuals, groups of individuals, groups and organizations.
d. conflict policy
Policy conflicts may occur because there is disagreement individual or group on the policy differences adduced by one party and the other policy
The process of the conflict will always occur anywhere, anyone, anytime. Conflict is a permanent reality of change, and change is a permanent reality in life, and followed the conflict, change and life will be permanent anyway.
B. THE PROCESS OF CONFLICT
According to Robbins (1996) conflict process consists of five stages:
(1) The potential opposition or incompatibility;
Opposition or potential incompatibility is the existence of conditions that recreate the opportunity for the emergence of koinflik. These conditions do not need to lead to conflict, but one of the conditions it is necessary if the conflict should arise.
(2) cognition and personalization;
Cognition and personalization is the perception of one party or both parties to the conflict at hand. Awareness by one or more parties to the existence of conditions that create opportunities for conflict.
(3) intent;
Intent is the decision to act in a certain way from the parties to the conflict. The purpose of the conflicting parties will be reflected or manifested in behavior, although not always consistent.
(4) behavior;
Behavior includes statements, actions, and reactions that were made to destroy the other hand, aggressive physical attacks, threats and ultimatun, verbal attacks were firm, question or challenge openly against any other party, and a small disagreement or misunderstanding.
(5) results.
The results are a tangle of actions and reactions between the parties in conflict and produce consequences. The results can be functional in the sense of conflict resulted in an improved performance of the group, or dysfunctional in the sense that hinder group performance by the parties in conflict.
C. EXAMPLES OF CONFLICT
There are many examples of conflicts that exist in the world, among others:
1. Conflict Vietnam turned into a war.
2. The Middle East conflict is an example of a conflict that is not controlled,
sehinggatimbul violence. this can be seen in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
3. Catholic-Protestant conflict in Northern Ireland provides examples of other historical conflicts
4. Many conflicts that occur because of differences in race and ethnicity. These include Bosnian-Croatian conflict (see Kosovo), conflict in Rwanda, and the conflict in Kazakhstan.
D.POLA CONFLICT RESOLUTION
According to Riggio (1990), the conflict can be positive or negative effect, and is always there in life. Therefore, the conflict should not necessarily have to be eliminated. The problem is, how it can be has a conflict in a way that does not cause social disintegration. Conflict management means to it that the conflict was at optimal levels. If the conflict becomes too large and leads to a bad outcome, then the conflict should be resolved. On the other hand, if the conflict is at a level that is too low, then the conflict should be raised.
In contrast again to the ones expressed by Soetopo (1999) that the conflict management strategy refers to an activity that is intended to manage the conflict from the planning, evaluation, and solution / settlement of a conflict that it becomes something positive for a change and goal achievement.
Based on some opinions about conflict management, it can be affirmed that conflict management is a way that individuals use in controlling, directing, and resolve conflicts, in this case is interpersonal conflict.
Hodge and Anthony (1991), gives an overview through various methods of resolution (settlement) conflict, as follows:
First, the method of use of force. People often use the power and authority so that conflicts can be mitigated or extinguished.
Second, the method of smoothing (smoothing). The parties to the conflict should be mutual understanding of the conflict with the language of love, to break and restore relationships that lead to peace.
Third, the completion of the democratic way. That is, providing an opportunity for each party to express opinions and give his opinion faith in the truth that can be accepted by both parties
A. CONFLICK
Humans as a way of social life in which human beings need other human beings essentially because man can not live alone without interacting. with their social interaction, life goes well, as for individual and group interaction Atar. Humans and even then alone can not be separated from two things: Conflict and cooperation. Thus manusi can never be separated from two things ..
Conflict is from the Latin meaning that cinfigurer hit each other. In sosioligis conflict interpreted from a process between one person or more (called kelomok) where an attempt to get rid of the other party in a way to destroy it or make it powerless. Conflict in large dictionary Indonesian was (2002) interpreted as pencekokan, strife, and discord.
The expert opinions on knflik among others:
Kartono and Gulo (1987)
Konfik is the lack of agreement in the opinion of emotions and actions with others. The situation is the result of impulses, desires, wishes and so contradictory, but work in the same time.
Robbins (1998)
proes also interpreted as a conflict that began when a party feel that the other party has negatively affected, or will mepengaruhi negative way, something noticed by the first party. A mismatch can not be considered as an act of conflict when one party yet know or understand the mismatch.
White and Bednar (1991)
Conflicts one of the interactions between people or groups who feel their interdependent conflicting objectives and mutually interfere with each other between one dala achieve that goal.
We already know a wide range of definitions in the catapult by experts with us can know about social conflict.
Conflicts are sourced from human to have a variety of reasons, so that stuff conflicts that occur in humans. So it is difficult to be made clearly and in detail of the sources of conflict. It is in karnakan something that should be a source of conflict, as well as vice versa. Sometimes something trivial nature could be a conflict between humans. Conflict in the background backs of differences in the characteristics that brought the individual in an interaction.
These differences sometimes includes physical traits, intelligence, knowledge, customs, beliefs, and so forth. By brought with him to the characteristics of the individual in social interaction, conflict is a normal situation in the community and not the people who have never experienced a conflict between its members as well as with other public tiem. The conflict will be lost if shared with the community itself.
The conclusion of the conflict is very diverse and sometimes irrational nature. By because we are not to be indecisive that mencadi source of conflict is a certain thing, let alone just is based on the things that are rational.
In general, the appearance of a conflict of interest as follows.
1.tidak equal to the needs, values and goals
2.adanya resources such as power, influence, space, time, money, fame, position and competition
Soetopo (1999) classifies the type of conflict, in terms of the material into four, namely:
a. conflict of interest
Conflict of interest occurs when there are two competitive goals or even contradictory.
b. the role conflicts
The role conflicts arise because men have more than one role and each role does not always have interests
same.
c. conflicts value
Value conflicts may arise because it is essentially the value of every individual in the organization is not the same, so the conflict
may occur between individuals, groups of individuals, groups and organizations.
d. conflict policy
Policy conflicts may occur because there is disagreement individual or group on the policy differences adduced by one party and the other policy
The process of the conflict will always occur anywhere, anyone, anytime. Conflict is a permanent reality of change, and change is a permanent reality in life, and followed the conflict, change and life will be permanent anyway.
B. THE PROCESS OF CONFLICT
According to Robbins (1996) conflict process consists of five stages:
(1) The potential opposition or incompatibility;
Opposition or potential incompatibility is the existence of conditions that recreate the opportunity for the emergence of koinflik. These conditions do not need to lead to conflict, but one of the conditions it is necessary if the conflict should arise.
(2) cognition and personalization;
Cognition and personalization is the perception of one party or both parties to the conflict at hand. Awareness by one or more parties to the existence of conditions that create opportunities for conflict.
(3) intent;
Intent is the decision to act in a certain way from the parties to the conflict. The purpose of the conflicting parties will be reflected or manifested in behavior, although not always consistent.
(4) behavior;
Behavior includes statements, actions, and reactions that were made to destroy the other hand, aggressive physical attacks, threats and ultimatun, verbal attacks were firm, question or challenge openly against any other party, and a small disagreement or misunderstanding.
(5) results.
The results are a tangle of actions and reactions between the parties in conflict and produce consequences. The results can be functional in the sense of conflict resulted in an improved performance of the group, or dysfunctional in the sense that hinder group performance by the parties in conflict.
C. EXAMPLES OF CONFLICT
There are many examples of conflicts that exist in the world, among others:
1. Conflict Vietnam turned into a war.
2. The Middle East conflict is an example of a conflict that is not controlled,
sehinggatimbul violence. this can be seen in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
3. Catholic-Protestant conflict in Northern Ireland provides examples of other historical conflicts
4. Many conflicts that occur because of differences in race and ethnicity. These include Bosnian-Croatian conflict (see Kosovo), conflict in Rwanda, and the conflict in Kazakhstan.
D.POLA CONFLICT RESOLUTION
According to Riggio (1990), the conflict can be positive or negative effect, and is always there in life. Therefore, the conflict should not necessarily have to be eliminated. The problem is, how it can be has a conflict in a way that does not cause social disintegration. Conflict management means to it that the conflict was at optimal levels. If the conflict becomes too large and leads to a bad outcome, then the conflict should be resolved. On the other hand, if the conflict is at a level that is too low, then the conflict should be raised.
In contrast again to the ones expressed by Soetopo (1999) that the conflict management strategy refers to an activity that is intended to manage the conflict from the planning, evaluation, and solution / settlement of a conflict that it becomes something positive for a change and goal achievement.
Based on some opinions about conflict management, it can be affirmed that conflict management is a way that individuals use in controlling, directing, and resolve conflicts, in this case is interpersonal conflict.
Hodge and Anthony (1991), gives an overview through various methods of resolution (settlement) conflict, as follows:
First, the method of use of force. People often use the power and authority so that conflicts can be mitigated or extinguished.
Second, the method of smoothing (smoothing). The parties to the conflict should be mutual understanding of the conflict with the language of love, to break and restore relationships that lead to peace.
Third, the completion of the democratic way. That is, providing an opportunity for each party to express opinions and give his opinion faith in the truth that can be accepted by both parties
0 Response to "discussion of conflict"
Posting Komentar